Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+S\-meter\s+readings\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+S\-meter\s+readings\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: S-meter readings... (score: 1): Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:19:42 +1000; G'day All, I have a question about something that has puzzled me for some time now. It concerns the procedure for giving signal reports. I understand the scale for readability - no problem. The probl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00034.html (9,461 bytes)
2. Re: LF: S-meter readings... (score: 1): Author: "vernall" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:08:51 +1200; G'day All, I have a question about something that has puzzled me for some time now. It concerns the procedure for giving signal reports. I understand the scale for readability - no problem. The probl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00036.html (10,575 bytes)
3. LF: S-meter readings... (score: 1): Author: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 02:06:27 -0400; Hello Steve, when I learned for my license at the beginning of the 70ties, I still used to learn the old system for S 1 to S 9 reports to be judged by ear. And that of course depends very much on the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00037.html (9,455 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]