Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+wspr\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+wspr\s*$/: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:44:09 +0100; Hi Gary, I use the WSPR progr integrated in the WSJT7 version and drive it in QSO mode, means -auto is on- . so you have the chance to connect me. But qso mode or not, you should be able to decode th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00961.html (9,536 bytes)
22. Re: LF: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:29:58 +0100; Dear LF group, Also using WSPR 1.01 beacon software here - 100% decodes so far... Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU Same problem here Uwe F4DTL JN18FP Dans un e-mail daté du 09/01/2009 22:19:06 Paris, M; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01287.html (9,991 bytes)
23. Re: LF: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:46:51 +0100; Jim I think the mode should of been named 'ICARUS' G .. Dear Uwe, Markus, That would explain it too - nothing serious I hope... Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU -- Original Message -- From: "Markus Ves; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01289.html (11,748 bytes)
24. LF: Re: wspr (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:06:19 +0100; Dear LF Group, The M0BMU WSPR beacon shut down at 1000utc - thanks to all for the reports overnight. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00284.html (10,082 bytes)
25. LF: RE: WSPR (score: 1): Author: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:38:59 +0100; Thanks Gus you are my best Dx to date, just slightly further out than John PG. A bit more ant work today on matching and also making an umbrella antenna as per design of M0BMU (thanks Jim). Hopefully; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00120.html (16,719 bytes)
26. Re: LF: Re: wspr (score: 1): Author: Peter Cleall <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:44:23 +0000 (GMT); I usually go to the wspr database on line and see what frequencies are being reported by others for the station I have heard. Then I average the reports and adjust my RX until it gives the average fi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00201.html (8,970 bytes)
27. LF: Re: wspr (score: 1): Author: "Gus" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:16:50 +0200; Hello Willem and LF, thank's report and info! 73 de Gus SM6BHZ www.sm6bhz.com 1634 -28 4.9 0.503910 -2 G7NKS IO92 10 1646 -30 5.8 0.503914 0 G7NKS IO92 23 1834 -2 5.1 0.503920 0 SM6BHZ JO57 40 1838 -; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00230.html (10,634 bytes)
28. LF: RE: wspr (score: 1): Author: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:03:55 +0100; Dear Willem Thanks for the new contact. Just upgraded from "wet String" to "short wire". Proper aerial is next!! With best regards Jim Dr. James Cowburn G7NKS E [email protected] --Original Me; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00367.html (10,588 bytes)
29. LF: Re: wspr (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:56:42 +0100; Dear LF Group, The WSPR beacon is now running again on 503.975kHz (502.4kHz "dial frequency"). Any reports would be very welcome. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00449.html (10,665 bytes)
30. LF: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:13:42 +0200; Lubos, you may want to check your indicated frequency. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Lubos OK2BVG To: [email protected] [email protected] Sen; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00467.html (11,498 bytes)
31. LF: Re: wspr (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:07:56 +0100; Well I seem to be copying something, but no decode of you Jim... 2012 -10 2.1 0.504019 0 SM6BHZ JO57 40 2022 -3 1.7 0.503978 0 G4WGT IO83 27 2026 -10 1.8 0.504022 0 SM6BHZ JO57 40 2034 -8 2.2 0.50392; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00478.html (10,893 bytes)
32. LF: Re: wspr (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:23:59 +0100; Dear Mal, LF Group, Struggling or not, I could consistently copy both the other beacons here, and received reports via the WSPRnet database from 17 different receiving stations in 7 countries, so not; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00557.html (11,123 bytes)
33. LF: Re: wspr (score: 1): Author: "Marcin" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:46:45 +0200; Dear Gus, LF Group This evening very strong copy your WSPR beacon: 2158 6 0.2 0.503951 0 SM6BHZ JO57 40 2206 3 0.9 0.503951 0 SM6BHZ JO57 40 2214 7 1.0 0.503951 0 SM6BHZ JO57 40 2222 1 0.9 0.503951 0; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00564.html (8,247 bytes)
34. LF: Re: wspr (score: 1): Author: "Gus" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 19:48:02 +0200; Hi Willhem, thank's report and info ! 73 de Gus SM6BHZ www.sm6bhz.com 1718 -20 0.6 0.503942 0 SM6BHZ JO57 40 1720 -21 0.6 0.503942 0 SM6BHZ JO57 40 1722 -21 0.8 0.503942 0 SM6BHZ JO57 40 1724 -22 0.7; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00739.html (10,685 bytes)
35. LF: Re: wspr (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:22:06 -0700; the same old repetive rubbish. g3kev very respectfull Mal WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://members.shaw.ca/ve7sl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00792.html (9,019 bytes)
36. LF: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: tim hague <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:56:14 +0100; Have my Rx on 500kHz (dial 502.4) immediately got copy of G7NKS, will leave it running for a while and uploading spots to the database Tim M0AFJ IO92OB, Milton Keynes; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00844.html (9,256 bytes)
37. LF: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:44:53 +0100; Since I have now changed my vertical to a 160m one and won't be on 500kHz until the spring I shall now be unsubscribing from this list for the time being. 73 Dave G3YMC http://www.davesergeant.com; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00125.html (10,120 bytes)
38. Re: LF: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: PETER CLEALL <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:36:05 +0000; In addition to what James has said. Use of the WSPR site more fully can eliminate a lot of the uncertainties being discussed If more stations use the WSPR website/database for reporting then more con; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00343.html (13,161 bytes)
39. LF: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:38:39 +0100; Dear Mal, LF Group, WSPR reports amongst stns indicate reception reports usually minus dB. Most of these stations are usually PLUS dB >with me or very close to that figure. So what does that prove. I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00405.html (13,286 bytes)
40. LF: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:23:10 +0100; Mal, WSPR reports amongst stns indicate reception reports usually minus dB. Most of these stations are usually PLUS dB with me or very close to that figure. WSPR refers the indicated SNR to a BW of 2; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00736.html (11,931 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]