Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+What\'s\s+the\s+best\s+receiver\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+What\'s\s+the\s+best\s+receiver\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: What's the best receiver? (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:39:37 +0100; Hi Martin, as Dave says the most cost effective way would be Albertos mod, even if you have to pay someone to do it for you. The Lowe receivers HF 150 and 225 are good I dont know the 125 but i think; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00252.html (13,804 bytes)
2. LF: RE: What's the best receiver? (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 12:50:10 +0100; Hi Martin, I am using a JRC NRD-345 receiver, got it second hand about �325.00 a couple of years ago. Sensitivity & stability is very good but it does require a narrow filter, I have fitted a 400Hz; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00312.html (9,781 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]