Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+Timing\s+issue\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+Timing\s+issue\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: WSPR Timing issue (score: 1): Author: John P-G <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:41:14 +0000; . And occasionally one sees spots reported at WSPRnet with an ODD minute timestamp - how's that done? John; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00118.html (8,895 bytes)
2. LF: Re: WSPR Timing issue (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:21:52 +0100; Dear Lee, Graham, LF Group, I did some experiments at M0LMH's suggestion (see below)... I think this is what he meant. Perhaps the results are also of interest to people in the Group who have experie; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00994.html (15,949 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: WSPR Timing issue (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:51:05 +0000; I haven't really been following this thread, and have deleted many of the relevent messages, unfortunately. But you can quite safely assume that all timing, apart from the ititial even minute kick-of; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01050.html (20,226 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]