Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+Spots\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+Spots\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: WSPR Spots (score: 1): Author: "dave.riley3" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:49:21 -0500; Am seeing activity on 503.900 but no WSPR decodes... Just widely separated dashes of about 8 seconds length... QRU According to the WSPR Spot database, there is some "interesting" DX being received c; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00069.html (9,299 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: WSPR Spots (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:55:11 +0100; Mark, I think 'we are looking at situation parallel with the argument of using video enhancement as evidence in the judicial system , in that the adjacent pixel decisions do not always result in a co; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00309.html (13,233 bytes)
3. LF: Re: WSPR Spots (score: 1): Author: "Mark" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:17:46 +0100; Hi all, The spurious calls generated here are as a result of a wideband birdie that wanders through the 500KHz band, probably a switchmode PSU Not all the bad decodes get uploaded, so there would app; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00386.html (10,872 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Re: WSPR Spots (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:29:35 +0100; Looks like a cw beacon .. but hf of that frequency .. don't see any wspr activity ? G .. http://www.wireless.org.uk/grab/ http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber1.html Am seeing activity on 503.9; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00417.html (10,770 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]