Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+SNR\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: WSPR SNR (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:45:25 +0100
Dear LF Group, Still watching G4WGT's WSPR signal here - it is interesting to see how it copes well with the QSB. Compare the last few decodes: 2006 -30 1.2 0.503599 0 G4WGT IO83 37 2014 -22 1.1 0.50
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00288.html (10,211 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: WSPR SNR (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:59:59 +0100
Jim, The thing to check for is the number of sync locks it has , ... gives a good idea of the path usability. G .. Dear LF Group, Still watching G4WGT's WSPR signal here - it is interesting to see ho
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00519.html (10,201 bytes)

3. LF: Re: WSPR SNR (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:47:04 +0100
Dear Jim, I would agree on your conclusion. Theoretically, a marginal "M" qrss signal with 6 dB SNR in 0.5 Hz noise bandwidth would rank - 34 - 3 + 6 dB = -31 dB on K1JT's scale, which is related to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00852.html (9,274 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu