Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+DECODES\s+\-\s+and\s+Opera\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+DECODES\s+\-\s+and\s+Opera\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: WSPR DECODES - and Opera (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 14:52:20 +0100; Markus Regardless of theory and speculation what I have observed in reality is that weak visible signals showing on the waterfall would be perfectly readable had the mode been QRSS whereas data modes; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00346.html (14,856 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: WSPR DECODES - and Opera (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 15:26:42 +0100; Hi Mal, whereas data modes when they do not decode they meaningless ...yes, the "all-or-nothing" or "brickwall" effect of error-correcting digital decoders. That's why I generally share your preferen; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00347.html (17,393 bytes)
3. LF: Re: WSPR DECODES - and Opera (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 15:45:05 +0100; Markus I appreciate your observations its like the old Analogue TV at least some sort of picture is visible whereas Digital TV it is all or nothing. 73 gl de mal/g3kev From: [email protected] Mark; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00348.html (18,351 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]