Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+\-2\s+SNR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+\-2\s+SNR\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: WSPR -2 SNR (score: 1): Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:14:28 +0100; Hello Jay, Thank you! I have increased the bandwidth to 2500 Hz now. It will be interesting to find if there will be substantial difference. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00090.html (10,643 bytes)
2. LF: Re: WSPR -2 SNR (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:03:58 -0400; My receiver bandwidth is 540 Hz. It has been shown in the past that a receiver bandwidth significatly less than 2500 Hz artificially inflates the reported WSPR s/n. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 Hello all; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00688.html (13,216 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]