Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WE2XGR\/2\s+WSPR\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: WE2XGR/2 WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:20:20 +0100
Dear Jay, LF Group, No copies of WE2XGR this morning - the PC clock has mysteriously advanced by 4 or 5 seconds, which may be why. Also, the termination of the EWE antenna is under a foot of snow, wh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00077.html (10,030 bytes)

2. LF: Re: WE2XGR/2 WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:12:47 +0100
Hello Jay, LFers, The signal stopped around 2332Z here and there's been nothing since. I hope you've not had a problem with weather as some of the other states did. I'll continue to watch in case you
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00090.html (9,315 bytes)

3. LF: Re: WE2XGR/2 WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:28:48 +0100
Dear Jay, LF Group, Thanks. The QRN level was building up here, but seems to have calmed down now... Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU Jim Will move up to 508.53. Jay
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00179.html (11,287 bytes)

4. LF: RE: WE2XGR/2 WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Hawkshaw" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:22:39 +0100
Hi, Jay, LF, Here are my first and last.... 2224 -26 -1.2 0.508529 0 WE2XGR FN31 57 0756 -29 0.0 0.508529 0 WE2XGR FN31 57 Cheers, de Mike G7AQA IO93DT. --Original Message-- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00209.html (10,916 bytes)

5. LF: Re: WE2XGR/2 WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:40:40 +0100
Dear Jay, LF Group, Would it be possible to QSY to slightly above last night's frequency - say to 508.52 or 508.53kHz RF? You would then be clear of the " intermittent CW" noise I am getting here on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00393.html (11,057 bytes)

6. LF: Re: WE2XGR/2 WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:43:43 +0100
Hello Jay, LFers, First indication of signal was at 2212Z, both on the WSPR computer and the other box running Spectran. I needed to tweak the clock by two seconds, then got the first decode at 2232Z
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00444.html (9,270 bytes)

7. LF: Re: WE2XGR/2 WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "Walter und Marianne Staubach" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:21:42 +0100
Please at what time in UTC exactly? 73 Walter DI2AG -- Original Message -- From: <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep" <r
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-03/msg00186.html (8,627 bytes)

8. LF: Re: WE2XGR/2 WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:21:04 +0100
Dear Jay, LF Group, Have now shifted to 494.4kHz "dial frequency" to monitor WE2XGR/2, which seems to be coming in nicely here tonight. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00714.html (9,751 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu