Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Signal\s+$or\s+interferer\?$\s+overnight\s+8\.976665kHz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Signal\s+$or\s+interferer\?$\s+overnight\s+8\.976665kHz\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Signal (or interferer?) overnight 8.976665kHz (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 18:56:51 +0100; Roger OM How did you copy OSSY today, he was producing a strong trace, keying the carrier. I was using the dfcw 600 window and probably could have copied him at a faster speed of 120, a QSO might hav; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00024.html (16,272 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Signal (or interferer?) overnight 8.976665kHz (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 19:14:41 +0100; Roger OM How did you copy OSSY today, he was producing a strong trace, keying the carrier. I was using the dfcw 600 window and probably could have copied him at a faster speed of 120, a QSO might h; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00075.html (19,064 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Signal (or interferer?) overnight 8.976665kHz (score: 1): Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:56:50 +0100 (BST); Roger, LF, Very interesting. I did do some impromtu testing last night on my usual frequency of 8.976 661 6 kHz I have installed a cover (tarpaulin) over my loading coil to keep out the rain and was; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00160.html (13,209 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Re: Signal (or interferer?) overnight 8.976665kHz (score: 1): Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 19:33:57 +0100; Roger OM How did you copy OSSY today, he was producing a strong trace, keying the carrier. I was using the dfcw 600 window and probably could have copied him at a faster speed of 120, a QSO might h; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00289.html (20,303 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Re: Signal (or interferer?) overnight 8.976665kHz (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:09:23 +0100; Thanks Chris. I had doubts it was you, but the signal seemed too stable for the usual interference seen. It is a pity G3ZJO didn't have his grabber on to see if he copied it over there too. Will be m; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00592.html (15,252 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]