Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+SUGGESTED\s+TEMPORARY\s+CHANGE\s+TO\s+\[OPERA\s+\]\s+MF\s+QRG\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+SUGGESTED\s+TEMPORARY\s+CHANGE\s+TO\s+\[OPERA\s+\]\s+MF\s+QRG\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: SUGGESTED TEMPORARY CHANGE TO [OPERA ] MF QRG (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:55:17 +0200; Hi Graham, going by my experience with Op-32 correlation experiments on LF, I would much rather have separate frequency bands for Op and WSPR. I also believe that 100 Hz for Opera-32 is much wider th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-05/msg00009.html (11,663 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: SUGGESTED TEMPORARY CHANGE TO [OPERA ] MF QRG (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:20:31 +0100; Ok Markus , wspr is based 1500 Hz and OP4 1800 Hz the pass bands are not overlapping , this was the original 500 KHz configuration for some years , until the 'dash to the mid band' occurred shortly a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-05/msg00200.html (13,446 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]