Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+wspr\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+wspr\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:14:15 +0000; SHANNON... Andy www.g4jnt.com http://www.g4jnt.com/6dBBetter.ppt (just presented at the Martlesham Microwave Roundtable); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00646.html (11,759 bytes)
22. LF: Re: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:23:10 +0100; Dear Mal, LF Group, WSPR reports amongst stns indicate reception reports usually minus dB. Most of these stations are usually PLUS dB >with me or very close to that figure. So what does that prove.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00778.html (13,458 bytes)
23. LF: Re: Re: WSPR (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:10:23 +0100; Two points Why waste 2.4 kHz when QRS only needs a few Hz with a better S/N ratio. You agree that a faint trace is visible. If this faint trace was QRS mode only a few Hz bandwidth would be necessary; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00796.html (13,349 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]