Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+73kHz\/136kHz\s+Last\s+night\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+73kHz\/136kHz\s+Last\s+night\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: Re: 73kHz/136kHz Last night (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:41:37 -0500; Peter, I was transmitting on what my DDS unit said was 72.400. EA1PX measured it as 72.40031. I was transmitting from 2300 until 0012. I double-checked the captures -- nothing visible. Next time! Joh; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00333.html (9,417 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: Re: 73kHz/136kHz Last night (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:12:28 -0500; Jose, Laurie, but captured one time as "XQC", on 72400.90 Hz - QRSS120. Then W1VD and I (and possibly WB3ANQ) may have seen a fragment of that signal. I was expecting something closer to 72401.0. At; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00339.html (9,600 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]