Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+CFA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+CFA\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: RE: CFA (score: 1): Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 09:43:38 +1100; G'day All, Am I wrong but doesn't the latest coverage map from the IoM site look a lot smaller than the old one? Yes I am wrong, it is only a little smaller :-) IMHO the IoM antenna will be deemed to; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00075.html (12,448 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Re: RE: CFA (score: 1): Author: Väinö Lehtoranta <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 10:06:54 +0200; Real hams don't worry about blood pressures etc but CFA debate has been going on for about 10 years now especially on NEC reflector, so there is no reason whatsoever to set up another group. 73 to al; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00082.html (8,990 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: Re: RE: CFA (score: 1): Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 07:18:09 +1100; G'day Väinö, Real hams don't worry about blood pressures.... Tsk, Tsk... Hams are supposed to be kind and considerate to others :-) CFA debate has been going on for about 10 years now especially on N; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00100.html (9,805 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]