Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Poor\s+conditions\s+\-\s+the\s+return\s+of\s+skywave\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Poor\s+conditions\s+\-\s+the\s+return\s+of\s+skywave\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: Poor conditions - the return of skywave (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:52:55 +0100; Hi Laurence you dont say what frequency the pole to pole path was? I wonder whether it might have been a sort of duct (trough its sometimes called) above the D-layer. The auroral hole might even help; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00297.html (16,035 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Re: Poor conditions - the return of skywave (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:10:57 +0100; Hi Laurence, interesting! Like Alan, I've wondered whether your N-S polar communication could have been through a field-aligned magnetospheric duct (referenced eg. by http://www.researchgate.net/publ; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-03/msg00298.html (18,501 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]