Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+HF

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+HF_MF2LF\s+\#1\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 09:26:27 -0500; Monitoring here as well...just in case. Thanks for the frequency info Jim. Jay, W1VD Dear Ed, LF Group, Just quickly checked your HF frequencies, which are 14213.650kHz and 14349.972kHz to the neares; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00368.html (13,088 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 19:53:49 +0100; Dear Ed, LF Group, Now seeing your sigs on 1882.314kHz and 3628.208kHz, +/-1Hz. This should make the 3rd order IM product 136.420kHz +/-2Hz. Nice to see some QRSS activity on 160m and 80m - with the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00372.html (11,117 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: Re: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:27:13 EST; Hi Ed and Jim, confirming Jim's measurement, freqs seen here at 19:20 are 2 x 1 882 313.6 - 3 628 208.2 = 136 419.0 73 de Markus, DF6NM In einer eMail vom 04.02.2006 19:53:49 Westeuropäische Normalze; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00375.html (8,539 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]