Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Further\s+MF\s+impressions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Further\s+MF\s+impressions\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: Further MF impressions (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:27:38 +0100; Alan I work both 160 metres and 600 metres and find both similar. Daytime range and night time similar. but you must compare like with like power and antenna wise. I use a 1/4 wave inv L on each band; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00281.html (12,400 bytes)
2. LF: Re: re: Further MF impressions (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:52:32 +0100; Laurence I am on the East coast near the sea and both 160/600 are similar. I suppose at other locations things might be different although when I have been elswhere I have never noticed that the top; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00413.html (15,594 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]