Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+CW\s+allocations\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+CW\s+allocations\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: CW allocations... (score: 1): Author: "boffin1" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:58:02 -0500; you are right, . Strictly it should be interpreted as uninterrupted - not even coded into morse but usage has modified the definition to permit morse. Roger.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00041.html (7,578 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: CW allocations... (score: 1): Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:52:51 +0100; To All from PA0SE (and please keep in mind that "CW" means Carrier Wave, not "Morse"..) I thought CW means Continuous Wave. Am I wrong? 73, Dick, PA0SE; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00082.html (8,603 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]