Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+ARRL\s+News\s+Story\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+ARRL\s+News\s+Story\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Re: ARRL News Story (score: 1): Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:17:49 +0000; readers. I agree entirely that 100% accuracy should always be the aim, and I believe that RadCom and QST both have a high hit rate, but the point I was making was that a story with some errors in it; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00335.html (10,264 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: ARRL News Story (score: 1): Author: "mike.dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:07:43 +0100; Editorial errors give the publisher a bad image with knowledgeable readers. Getting it right the first time takes a lot of beating. I agree entirely that 100% accuracy should always be the aim, and; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00385.html (9,775 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]