Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Rugby\s+\-\s+Anthorn\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Rugby\s+\-\s+Anthorn\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: RE: Re: Rugby - Anthorn (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 20:06:28 +0100; Their measurements show the field strength is above the spec. but I suspect this does not help if you were relying on a much stronger signal that NPL requested from from Rugby to overcome screening o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00356.html (12,954 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: RE: Re: Rugby - Anthorn (score: 1): Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 15:40:09 +0100; Hello David, Adding my comments to your webpages is no problem at all. I have been monitoring MSF since this morning and the signal is now 1 dB stronger at -65 dBm. Best regards, Roelof; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00357.html (10,490 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: RE: Re: Rugby - Anthorn (score: 1): Author: david towers <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 11:55:40 +0100; Hi Roeloff and all I find this information very interesting and did try to follow and record comments on the progress of the changeover. http://g8szx.mediumwaveradio.org At my location in Leicestersh; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00358.html (11,903 bytes)
4. LF: Re: RE: Re: Rugby - Anthorn (score: 1): Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 10:17:53 +0100; Hello John, I have been monitoring MSF and whilst transmitting from Rugby at daytime the signal has always been around - 55 dBm. At present the level is - 66 dBm, hence 9 dB weaker. This is a rather; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00359.html (10,754 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]