Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Hartmut\s+Wolff\'s\s+grabber\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Hartmut\s+Wolff\'s\s+grabber\.\.\.\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: RE: Hartmut Wolff's grabber... (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:18:34 +0100; Hi Jim I do not know of any better predictor of the probability of good conditions on LF than Dst. One problem is that most things degrade the signal :-)) Also because the ionospheric return is from; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00212.html (17,086 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]