Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RCA\s+7844\s+RCA\s+7819\s+$7619\s+\?$\s+TO3\s+Power\s+trans\s+ideas\s+as\s+to\s+equivalents\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RCA\s+7844\s+RCA\s+7819\s+$7619\s+\?$\s+TO3\s+Power\s+trans\s+ideas\s+as\s+to\s+equivalents\s+\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: RCA 7844 RCA 7819 (7619 ?) TO3 Power trans ideas as to equivalents ?? (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:29:09 +0100; Those dont look like RCA part numbers.....more like date codes ...viz week 44 of 1978 RCA power devices have 5 digit nos starting like 40xxx. I think I have a 1980s data book here somewhere Alan G3NY; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-06/msg00066.html (11,726 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: RCA 7844 RCA 7819 (7619 ?) TO3 Power trans ideas as to equivalents ?? (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 21:18:04 +0100; Ah , that would explain it , I had the 5 digit as some form of batch number 60127 flags as 2N3055 ....... sort of to of been expected , in view of the application now to start digging in the attic ..; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-06/msg00223.html (12,609 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: RCA 7844 RCA 7819 (7619 ?) TO3 Power trans ideas as to equivalents ?? (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 21:29:52 +0100; Hi Graham it gets a bit fraught cos some numbers are House codes fot particular customers but 3055 souds sensible....yes 60xxx is also a standard format Alan -- Original Message -- From: g8fzk@g8fzk.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-06/msg00224.html (14,279 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]