Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Order\s+Number\:\s+TEMGNBWH700867\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Order\s+Number\:\s+TEMGNBWH700867\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Order Number: TEMGNBWH700867 (score: 1): Author: "John Rabson" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:56:45 +0100; Hi Doc and guys The ISO standard is Year, Month, Day, which shouldn't confuse either side, unless one is from Mars perhaps. I have started to use this when I can remember, but I still prefer Day, Mo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00673.html (9,258 bytes)
2. SV: LF: Re: Order Number: TEMGNBWH700867 (score: 1): Author: "Johan Bodin" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:23:15 +0100; Hi The ISO standard is Year, Month, Day, which shouldn't confuse either side, unless one is from Mars perhaps. Yes, this is the logical way to write a date - most significant digit first. I think tha; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00686.html (8,786 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: Order Number: TEMGNBWH700867 (score: 1): Author: "john sexton" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:40:57 -0800 (PST); Hi Doc and guys The ISO standard is Year, Month, Day, which shouldn't confuse either side, unless one is from Mars perhaps. I have started to use this when I can remember, but I still prefer Day, Mon; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00688.html (8,917 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Re: Order Number: TEMGNBWH700867 (score: 1): Author: "Doc Gruis" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 22:38:04 -0600; Okay - okay. Let us make that 09 January, 2001. I really like the day-month-year sequence better, but unless it is spelled out it just doesn't get understood on this side of the pond. :-) Doc. Well,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00694.html (10,164 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Re: Order Number: TEMGNBWH700867 (score: 1): Author: "M.J.Powell" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:18:19 +0000; Hello from Iowa in the USA. The "LF Experimenter's Handbook arrived today and it was dispatched on 02 Jan., 2001. Well, your message is dated 1st September 2001... Mike -- M.J.Powell; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00696.html (9,882 bytes)
6. Re: LF: Re: Order Number: TEMGNBWH700867 (score: 1): Author: "Doc Gruis" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 16:05:11 -0600; 01/09/2001 Hello from Iowa in the USA. The "LF Experimenter's Handbook arrived today and it was dispatched on 02 Jan., 2001. It looks like a most interesting work. I almost wish I did not have lodge; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00703.html (9,548 bytes)
7. LF: Re: Order Number: TEMGNBWH700867 (score: 1): Author: "Doc Gruis" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 08:56:14 -0600; I am getting discouraged. STILL NOT HERE: 01/05/2001 I have received orders from another source in England and twice from a source in N. Ireland within a week. This is now nearing three months since; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00832.html (12,743 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]