Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+New\s+band\s+plan\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+New\s+band\s+plan\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: New band plan (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 14:08:09 +0100; [email protected] wrote: Hi Alberto and Group, Only 800 Hz for CW, and that in the worst part of the band (QRM, Luxembourg Effect, DCF39, DLF splatter // intermod) ? No thanks... [...] Hi Wolf and the g; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00414.html (8,311 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: New band plan (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:34:31 EST; Hi Alberto and Group, Only 800 Hz for CW, and that in the worst part of the band (QRM, Luxembourg Effect, DCF39, DLF splatter // intermod) ? No thanks... If we needed an 'official band plan' at all,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00436.html (9,138 bytes)
3. LF: Re: New band plan (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 16:43:19 +0100; I am happy to notice that the RSGB HF committee has wise men who understand that specifice nature of the 136kHz ham band (only 2.1kHz in an extreme high noise part of the spectrum) makes it more an; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00444.html (9,634 bytes)
4. LF: Re: New band plan (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 16:05:05; As it happens, the suggested bandplan (at http://www.g3wkl.freeserve.co.uk/lf/136kHz.html) has now been submitted to IARU region 1 for ratification. Hello all, I don't believe that I am wrong when I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00446.html (10,843 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]