Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+New\s+Eu\s+slot\s+136\.177\s+kHz\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+New\s+Eu\s+slot\s+136\.177\s+kHz\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: New Eu slot 136.177 kHz? (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:35:46 -0500; Not so good here ... see attached .jpg Jay Attachment: 136177.jpg Description: JPEG image; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00239.html (9,593 bytes)
2. LF: Re: New Eu slot 136.177 kHz? (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:23:52 -0500; Please disregard my earlier post and capture. The new slot at 136.177 kHz cleaned up nicely ... once I remembered to short the TX antenna to ground. Doh! Jay; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00259.html (9,443 bytes)
3. LF: Re: New Eu slot 136.177 kHz? (score: 1): Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:25:16 -0500; 136.177 in North Carolina. Dex JPEG image; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00666.html (10,810 bytes)
4. LF: Re: New Eu slot 136.177 kHz? (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:38:04 +0100; Thanks a lot to John, Jay, Mal, Jean-Pierre, Dexter for the feedback, and for looking into the noise. So I take this as a thumbs-up for the new frequency from the American players? Would still like t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00795.html (11,479 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Re: New Eu slot 136.177 kHz? (score: 1): Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:04:51 -0800; Hi Markus Thanks for this consideration and your leadership on a consensus approach to resolving this. Jay's post clearly demonstrates the need for change to ensure active contributors aren't frustra; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00343.html (20,756 bytes)
6. LF: Re: New Eu slot 136.177 kHz? (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:53:00 +0100; Dear LF group, the considerations which led to the choice of a new Eu waterhole have been explained in a posting from Dec 12th, attached beneath. Here's a brief summary of the current situation: - We; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00771.html (17,641 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]