Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Modifications\s+of\s+Kenwood\s+TS\s+950\s+SD\s+and\s+TS\s+50\s+S\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Modifications\s+of\s+Kenwood\s+TS\s+950\s+SD\s+and\s+TS\s+50\s+S\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Modifications of Kenwood TS 950 SD and TS 50 S (score: 1): Author: "Marco Cadeddu" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 19:13:50 +0100; Hello Tom, although the TS950SD is in my my shack since 1991..I never made the modification for general tx coverage. I don't think it can transmit on 500 kHz if you carry out the mod, but probably co; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-08/msg00224.html (11,090 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Modifications of Kenwood TS 950 SD and TS 50 S (score: 1): Author: "Marco Cadeddu" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:44:31 +0100; Hi Tom, it's a really pity that no output is available below 160m.. but probably also in this case the reason is some "digital" block (I guess a diode somewhere) blocking the tx enable in order to sa; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-08/msg00314.html (14,482 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: Modifications of Kenwood TS 950 SD and TS 50 S (score: 1): Author: DK1IS <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:32:22 +0200; Hello Marco, modifying to general TX coverage results in a lowest TX QRG of 1620 kHz for the TS 950 and (heaven knows why) 1705 kHz for the TS 50. At lower frequencies there is no driver output so t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-08/msg00321.html (13,068 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]