Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Low\s+dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Low\s+dipole\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Low dipole (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:31:16 +0100; I've always wondered about dipoles / loops at 136k? A 'dipole' just lying on rocky ground where the water table is many metres below the surface could be quite effective. The angle of radiation would; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00089.html (11,115 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]