Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+DL6NN\s+on\s+137\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+DL6NN\s+on\s+137\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: DL6NN on 137 (score: 1): Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:34:58 +0200; Hi Rik, Thanks for the heads-up. I think your antenna is better than mine, but possibly not by much. I do have another concern however, and that is the high voltage at the antenna. The capacitance at; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-07/msg00041.html (11,915 bytes)
2. LF: Re: DL6NN on 137 (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:05:44 +0200; ...a screenshot... http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DL6NN%20QRSS-6.jpg 73, Stefan PS: Now visible at DF6NM, probably just due to the 2uV/m setting... Am 22.07.2011 18:54, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: L; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-07/msg00053.html (10,004 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: DL6NN on 137 (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:07:42 +0200; He seems to be new on the band. No other stations visible in the moment. Surely it would be a positive impulse if new stations could get some QSOs. This could start a positive spiral of activity. It'; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-07/msg00063.html (10,735 bytes)
4. LF: Re: DL6NN on 137 (score: 1): Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 23:00:04 +0200; Well, I am all for it.. Now that we (PA) are kicked off of 500 KHz (again!) I needed another challenge. So 136 KHz it is. I have already built a PA for 136. My design is for > 1KW, I have only tested; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-07/msg00242.html (13,440 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]