Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Calculating\s+ERP\s+from\s+measured\s+field\s+strength\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Calculating\s+ERP\s+from\s+measured\s+field\s+strength\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Calculating ERP from measured field strength (score: 1): Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:13:34 +0200; To Reg, G4FGQ and the LF-group Reg, G4FGQ wrote: Yes, I am aware of that. But I am interested in the extent to which VLF predicting capability of program GrndWav3 is affected by skywaves. It would be; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00098.html (10,484 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Calculating ERP from measured field strength (score: 1): Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:04:51 +0200; To All from PA0SE Reg Edwards, G4FGQ, wrote: I have just checked the source code in program GrndWav3. It does make use of CCIR curves and data for refraction over the horizon although I have had to u; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00122.html (10,645 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Calculating ERP from measured field strength (score: 1): Author: "Reg Edwards" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 13:58:15 +0100; Hello Dick and all, Thanks very much for your figures. I am not srprised at program predicting accuracy because attenuation is not very much different from 6dB for every doubling of distance and not; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00130.html (11,117 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]