Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+CW\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 19:27:16 +0100
I'm new around here so :- Why cross-band ? bryan G3GVB -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] hamilton mal To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Sunday, Augus
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00017.html (9,810 bytes)

2. LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: "Dick" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:35:39 +0200
That would be a pitty......... I do my transmitter and power supply running, but not had time to built the coil and antenna... Hope to be on this winter........ 73 Dick, pa4vhf (jo32eh)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00018.html (8,417 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:27:04 -0500
That is so you guys can hear Mal :-D :-D calling you on 7025. Later, -- Mike WE0H WD2XGI captbrian wrote: I'm new around here so :- Why cross-band ? bryan G3GVB -- Original Message -- From: g3kev.ham
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00019.html (11,567 bytes)

4. LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Tilley" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:13:31 -0700
"The stations operating on these modes are audible with me and possibly others and a proper QSO is possible, in fact these countries have been worked before on CW many times, so what is the point." E
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00021.html (8,729 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:46:22 EDT
That would be a pity......... What, the demise of LF? Don't worry, it's the same annual prediction Mal has been making since six months after the 136kHz band was first opened.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00022.html (7,943 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:05:50 -0500
-- Mike WE0H WD2XGI [email protected] wrote: In a message dated 8/3/04 3:49:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: That would be a pity......... What, the demise of LF? Don't worry,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00023.html (9,189 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 23:38:55 +0100
-- Original Message -- From: [email protected] WE0H Mike To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 3:05 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW That woul
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00030.html (10,211 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 18:03:15 -0500
High school was 20 years ago with college in between. Grow up loser >:o Mike hamilton mal wrote: -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] WE0H Mike To: [email protected] rsgb_l
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-08/msg00034.html (11,888 bytes)

9. LF: Re: CW (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 19:26:36 +0100
Prolly working for the government........ ...........no real experience about the subject.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-10/msg00261.html (8,287 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu