Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+CFH\s+on\s+136\.9559\s+kHz\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+CFH\s+on\s+136\.9559\s+kHz\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: CFH on 136.9559 kHz ? (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:44:26 +0100; Markus It is definitely CFH, and is quite loud here at 700 km. I have been watching the line on your screen as well! Unfortunately, I'm not set up presently to make an accurate field strength reading; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00180.html (10,541 bytes)
2. LF: Re: CFH on 136.9559 kHz ? (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:12:06 +0100; Markus, Curiosity took over, and I attempted a mid-afternoon measurement of the CFH carrier's field strength. I get 235 uV/M at 697 kM. A quick check with a great circle plot shows about 70% of that; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00186.html (8,617 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]