Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Amplifier\s+required\s+for\s+LF\s+DX\/weak\s+signals\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Amplifier\s+required\s+for\s+LF\s+DX\/weak\s+signals\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Amplifier required for LF DX/weak signals? (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:36:01 +0100; Dear Daniele, LF Group, opinion is that a bigger non-amplified loop is better than a smaller amplified loop and an amplifier should be used only if really necessary (and only with the strictly requir; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00228.html (16,238 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Amplifier required for LF DX/weak signals? (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:49:39 +0100; daniele I use large loops and inv L antennas and do not need any preamps, however the RX needs to be sensitive and suitable for purpose. With small loops and poor RX sensitivity a preamp is probably; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00460.html (13,876 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]