Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+8\.3\s+kHz\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: 8.3 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 10:56:29 -0700
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00213.html (19,831 bytes)

2. LF: Re: 8.3 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:39:00 +0100
My grabber at 8270 is loading. Lets see what QRM does here between 8234 and 8305 Hz www.qsl.net/pa1sdb (did just start it at 23h00) -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Markus Vester To:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00244.html (15,966 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: 8.3 kHz (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 11:10:56 +0100
OK, Peter and all, today Ill adjust the aerial system at 8270Hz. afterwards doing som e tests in modes carrier only and Op-4H. GL Uwe/dj8wx Von: [email protected] Gesendet: 02.01.2014 23:0
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00646.html (15,365 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: 8.3 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:15:57 +0000
Peter, LF etc, I have also opened a split screen grabber looking at 8970Hz & 8270Hz to compare the noise levels etc. You can access the grabber at my main grabber by a link "Go to Sub 9kHz" :- http:/
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00647.html (18,512 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: 8.3 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:27:17 +0100
Gary great, thanks for pointing this out. I really like that side-by-side comparison. Assuming you are using nonresonant input circuitry and equal brightness settings, 8.27 kHz seems a tad noisier th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00648.html (19,578 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: 8.3 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:45:41 +0000
Hi Marcus, LF, Yes, non-resonant & should be equal settings on both displays. Not high resolution, just corrected the information on the grab. "Width of one FFT-bin: 22.8882 mHz" If any changes neede
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00649.html (21,980 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: 8.3 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:53:30 +0000
Marcus, LF, Ref : My split 8270Hz & 8970Hz grabber. I had difficulty getting the sample rate detector running, getting message frequency too far off or similar, SL version v2.79 b04. I gave up in the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00650.html (22,074 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: 8.3 kHz (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 20:13:52 +0100
Hi Gary, If, by chance, you have a screenshot of the SR detector (with the main tab and the tab with the 'scope', which shows the squared MSK baseband signal) I'd like to find out what went wrong the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00651.html (23,483 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu