Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+600\s+V\s+160\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+600\s+V\s+160\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: 600 V 160 (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:15:52 +0100; I intend to do comparisons rather later in the year, when both 500k and 160m will come into their own for longer distance working at night. But my configuration using my Butternut 10m vertical on bot; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-08/msg00107.html (11,410 bytes)
2. LF: RE: 600 V 160 (score: 1): Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:38:20 +0100; Mal et al, it will be an interesting comparison, but it will be the ERP (estimated or otherwise) that will be important, as well as some absolute measurement of the noise floor on each band. Incident; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-08/msg00108.html (9,119 bytes)
3. LF: Re: 600 V 160 (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:57:47 +0100; Would have to be at night, 1.8 wont travel that well during the day ? G .. Hi all It would be interesting to try both bands at the same time over a given path to compare propagation. I am using a 1/4; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-08/msg00180.html (9,792 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]