Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+3\s+Topwires\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+3\s+Topwires\s+\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: 3 Topwires ?? (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:20:13 +0100; Hi Tom It does not seem to matter at all. You can parallel them at the feed, at the end or have them as a meander wire. The increase in capacity seems to be the same Though 50cm spacing is a little c; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00027.html (9,512 bytes)
2. LF: Re: 3 Topwires ?? (score: 1): Author: "F6CWN" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:30:40 +0100; Hello Tom, A very good question indeed, i think this is a capacitor, then short circuit at the end also. The wire parralel to the ground do not radiatate RF in LF. In the NDB beacons, the top "mushro; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00028.html (9,413 bytes)
3. LF: Re: 3 Topwires ?? (score: 1): Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:54:38 +0100; Hi Tom At the moment the three ends are insulate. Is it better to short the three ends, or better to insulate the ends?? As far as performance is concerned it doesn't seem to make any noticeable diff; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-10/msg00255.html (8,871 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]