Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+136khz\s+rx\s+in\s+NC\s+30dec11\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: 136khz rx in NC 30dec11 (score: 1)
Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:11:04 +0000
mal hamilton wrote: A xband qso would not take long on 7033 my report fm u on CW with callsigns and I briefly reply on 136173.5 Presently the only HF antenna I have up is a low NVIS dipole for 60 met
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00350.html (9,694 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: 136khz rx in NC 30dec11 (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:28:07 +0100
Dex Tnx info. I am QRV on 5 Mhz also and its possible to work u xband there. I have worked the USA on 5 Mhz in the past, evening time de mal/g3kev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00453.html (9,308 bytes)

3. LF: Re: 136khz rx in NC 30dec11 (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:19:30 +0100
Hi Dex Some nice shots from last nite ur end. A xband qso would not take long on 7033 my report fm u on CW with callsigns and I briefly reply on 136173.5 ie R O or R 56 etc (normal HF dx procedure) 7
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00482.html (8,863 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu