Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\[rsgb\-lf\-group\]\s+SlowJT9\s+update\s+$v0\.9\.15\.0$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\[rsgb\-lf\-group\]\s+SlowJT9\s+update\s+$v0\.9\.15\.0$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] SlowJT9 update (v0.9.15.0) (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:43:38 -0500; Hello Rik, all, Two comments, see below. I have seen this work both ways. Sometimes SlowJT9 will decode something WSJT-X does not. Other times WSJT-X will decode something SlowJT9 does not. Usually t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-01/msg00461.html (16,009 bytes)
2. LF: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] SlowJT9 update (v0.9.15.0) (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 22:04:05 +0000; Hi Paul, all, SlowJT9 vs WSJT-X: as I mentioned it was pure luck that SlowJT9 performed better that night. But as the only reason I can think of is a small timing difference between both it might be; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-01/msg00463.html (14,993 bytes)
3. LF: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] SlowJT9 update (v0.9.15.0) (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 20:19:43 +0000; Hello Les, all, WX permitting I will be QRV on Saturday (here in Europe) starting 5h30 UTC. I will monitor JT9, JT9-2 and JT9-5 all night. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T _______________________________________; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-02/msg00002.html (15,280 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]