Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\[rsgb\-lf\-group\]\s+Frequencies\s+for\s+JT9\-Slow\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\[rsgb\-lf\-group\]\s+Frequencies\s+for\s+JT9\-Slow\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] Frequencies for JT9-Slow (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 07:00:33 -0500; Andy, The present version of SlowJT9 has a limit of 843 Hz audio frequency for JT9-5. JT9-10 when implemented may have a 419 Hz limit. During recent tests, some preferred to transmit around 136.6 to; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-01/msg00016.html (13,560 bytes)
2. LF: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] Frequencies for JT9-Slow (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 12:32:46 +0000; OK, so it looks as if the preference is for a "Dial" (or as I prefer to call it, 'SSB Carrier' ) Frequency the same as for WSPR then adjust the audio tone appropriately. Makes sense. I really ought t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-01/msg00017.html (13,623 bytes)
3. LF: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] Frequencies for JT9-Slow (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 08:51:08 -0500; It is for me. When doing mode comparison tests or any time I particularly want stations to listen for me, I prefer to set up such that listeners can use the same 'dial' setting as for WSPR/OPERA/what; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-01/msg00019.html (15,339 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]