Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\[500\]\s+500\s+bandplan\,\s+and\s+frequencies\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\[500\]\s+500\s+bandplan\,\s+and\s+frequencies\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: [500] 500 bandplan, and frequencies? (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:59:39 +0000 (GMT); Hi All I am in agreement with letting the band develop organically. I am xtal controlled and use 8 meg 2metre Pye Cambridge TX xtals. They were multiplied 18 times to get onto 145 megs. I now divide; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00107.html (8,191 bytes)
2. LF: Re: [500] 500 bandplan, and frequencies? (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:23:31 +0100; Maybe after Dave's (G3WCB's) pertinent comment I should amplify my comment a bit. I see no reason why we cannot have some agreements about useful frequencies particularly whilst there are ways of mak; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-03/msg00108.html (12,281 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]