Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\"Low\s+loss\s+inductors\"\s+\.\.EW\&WW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\"Low\s+loss\s+inductors\"\s+\.\.EW\&WW\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: "Low loss inductors" ..EW&WW (score: 1): Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 10:44:02 +0100; To All from PA0SE Hi All, a little technical conundrum . I was musing about some of the text in the article flagged up by Christer in Electronics World (Wireless World to all us older ones!) It gives; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00261.html (13,331 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: "Low loss inductors" ..EW&WW (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:19:16; There have been some mails about using a (rather big) piece as inductor. Dick (PA0SE) gave us the results of a computer calculation (TRA from N6BV) and that seems quite OK to me, except for the fact; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00291.html (12,593 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]