Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\.LF\s+Tests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\.LF\s+Tests\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re.LF Tests (score: 1): Author: "Steve Rawlings" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 11:36:37 +0000; Hi Laurie, and a Happy New Year! If the Greek station will not bother John below 135.8, how about using your 135.722 frequency? The advantage would be that CW op's having simple receivers will be le; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00019.html (8,273 bytes)
2. LF: Re.LF Tests (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 12:05:27 +0100; John wrote:- I hear the Greek station weakly but dont belive it will stop receptoin below 135.8. Here the whole band 135.75-135.85 is full of SXV sidebands! would it not be better to adopt the range; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00022.html (7,974 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]