Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\.\s+LF\s+Test\s+frequencies\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\.\s+LF\s+Test\s+frequencies\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re. LF Test frequencies (score: 1): Author: "Steve Rawlings" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 21:13:37 +0000; One reason might be that John VE1ZJ - who is best placed to determine his preferred receive frequency - has already stated "I would prefer that anyone trying to come . . . to North America would use; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00926.html (8,655 bytes)
2. LF: Re. LF Test frequencies (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 21:14:16 +0100; I agree with Mike, we have an agreed sub-band for EU-VE 135.900- 136.000, these frequencies keep us clear of SVX and the Canadian LORAN so why change? I hope we can agree before the Jan 12/13 tests.7; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00927.html (7,992 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]