Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\.\s+73KHz\s+tests\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\.\s+73KHz\s+tests\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re. 73KHz tests (score: 1): Author: "jannsen" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 22:04:43 +0200; Ko Versteeg schrieb: skip For 73 i used,- Antenna: Chelcom Hf-v1. [ ¼Wave helical for 80m ] Pre-amp: 28dB. Filter: 25Hz. Hope to see some more on Friday and Saturday night, can't make it any other ni; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00236.html (8,787 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re. 73KHz tests (score: 1): Author: "John Currie" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 21:33:29 -0400; Hi Laurie , Sri no picts that night. Will keep looking 73 es GL de john VE1ZJ P.S. Plans for tx ant are firming up Laurie Mayhead wrote: Hi John,Sorry nothing seen last night. I am quite keen to conf; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00238.html (8,848 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re. 73KHz tests (score: 1): Author: "Ko Versteeg" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 22:14:43 +0100; At 6/5/01 13:23:00, you wrote: Hi Peter, I dont think Ko's findings are too far out. Please forget my mistake, R.res calculated should read 0.02 ohms. If we take your estimated Rad.pwr of 23.2 mW and; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00248.html (9,102 bytes)
4. LF: Re. 73KHz tests (score: 1): Author: "Laurie Mayhead" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:28:19 +0100; Hi John, Sorry nothing seen last night. I am quite keen to confirm the other nights sighting so will transmit again tonight. Freq. confirmed as 71,921.5KHz. shift now a little greater at 0.1hz DFCW o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00250.html (8,560 bytes)
5. LF: Re. 73KHz tests (score: 1): Author: "Laurie Mayhead" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:23:51 +0100; Hi Peter, I dont think Ko's findings are too far out. Please forget my mistake, R.res calculated should read 0.02 ohms. If we take your estimated Rad.pwr of 23.2 mW and increase it by 8db (x6.31) thi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00257.html (8,854 bytes)
6. LF: Re. 73KHz tests (score: 1): Author: "Laurie Mayhead" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:58:29 +0100; Thanks Ko for the report.glad you saw us. Thanks Peter for the comments on the B.09 K Amp.I think I must be getting 600/700 W since my Ant current is 3.5A (ground loss probably twice that on 136 say; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00283.html (8,769 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]