Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RTTY\s+on\s+73\.3\s+kHz\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RTTY on 73.3 kHz? (score: 1)
Author: "PY3CRX PY2PLL" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 03:20:07 -0200
Detected here (23°S/46°W) at 05:20UTC ... 73 Marcus, PY3CRX/PY2PLL GG66rf http://py.qsl.br Active from "DC" to 24GHz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00081.html (9,672 bytes)

2. Re: LF: RTTY on 73.3 kHz? (score: 1)
Author: "PY3CRX PY2PLL" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:19:01 -0200
Hi ... The same FSK, 100Hz shift, was received at 23°S/46°W at 4:30 UTC aprox, centered at 73.25KHz. Sometimes audible, but most of the time only detected on Spectran. Other signals: DCF77 (77.5K) de
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00090.html (8,706 bytes)

3. Re: LF: RTTY on 73.3 kHz? (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:42:09 -0500
John, That is it! Your picture shows exactly what I see on 73.3kHz. It is not RTTY but 100Hz wide FSK centred on 73.25. You evidently have a very good antenna for this direction. I would very much ap
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00093.html (9,756 bytes)

4. Re: LF: RTTY on 73.3 kHz? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:35:37 +0100
Can't remember what the ERP for the 73.25k Rugby transmission was when I measured it last, but I think it was in the 10s of kW. With amateur signals of the order of 100mW or so, the difference in ERP
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00094.html (9,970 bytes)

5. Re: LF: RTTY on 73.3 kHz? (score: 1)
Author: "john sexton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 02:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Hi John, That is it! Your picture shows exactly what I see on 73.3kHz. It is not RTTY but 100Hz wide FSK centred on 73.25. You evidently have a very good antenna for this direction. I would very much
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00099.html (8,102 bytes)

6. Re: LF: RTTY on 73.3 kHz? (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:25:26 +0000
Dear Dexter, Peter, LF Group, Can't remember what the ERP for the 73.25k Rugby transmission was when I measured it last, but I think it was in the 10s of kW. With amateur signals of the order of 100m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00115.html (10,848 bytes)

7. Re: LF: RTTY on 73.3 kHz? (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 11:04:05 -0500
I need to do some more detective work, but I have a strong signal here in Massachusetts, from 73.2 to 73.3 kHz. There have been listings of CFH on 73.6, but perhaps they have moved down to 73.25. In
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00117.html (10,345 bytes)

8. Re: LF: RTTY on 73.3 kHz? (score: 1)
Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 16:40:23 +0100
Hi Dexter & Bob I lost all signal from the 73.3 kHz RTTY station by 0100 UT last evening. QRN was very high so the signal could have been just below my noise level. Relative signal strength logged ar
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00119.html (11,036 bytes)

9. Re: LF: RTTY on 73.3 kHz? (score: 1)
Author: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 09:58:37 -0500
I lost all signal from the 73.3 kHz RTTY station by 0100 UT last evening. QRN was very high so the signal could have been just below my noise level. Relative signal strength logged are as follows: 21
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00120.html (13,257 bytes)

10. LF: RTTY on 73.3 kHz? (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 13:59:38 +0100
Just for grins, I recorded a 15 sec .wav file of the 73.3 kHz RTTY signal and uploaded it at: www.qsl.net/w4dex/73khzRTTY.wav It sounds strong enough I almost believe it would print here if the stat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00123.html (12,604 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu