Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+ROS\s+502kHz\s+X\-Band\s+3602kHz\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+ROS\s+502kHz\s+X\-Band\s+3602kHz\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: ROS 502kHz X-Band 3602kHz (score: 1): Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:50:36 +0000; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00095.html (10,664 bytes)
2. Re: LF: ROS 502kHz X-Band 3602kHz (score: 1): Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:49:58 +0000; RX1: 19:59 @ 6,7 Hz: CQ CQ DE G4WGT IN IO83QO 502KHZ OR 3590KHZ X-BAND ROS4 PSE K <STOP> -24 dB 655 km @ 329º 0,502 Mhz RX1: 20:06 @ 6,7 Hz: CQ CQ DE G4WGT IN IO83QO 502KHZ OR 3590KHZ X-BAND; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00124.html (11,209 bytes)
3. Re: LF: ROS 502kHz X-Band 3602kHz (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:42:03 +0100; G. 3578 .. was a good frequency for MF-1 / 7 Reply , just on the edge of the psk band , giving carrier 3579.5 X 2 ros will not work on most pc 's with the new level of coding , that was the problem w; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00471.html (10,996 bytes)
4. LF: ROS 502kHz X-Band 3602kHz (score: 1): Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:20:29 +0000; LF, I am calling CW for QSO 502kHz or X-Band 3602kHz, please use ROS4 on 80m. Gary - G4WGT.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00511.html (9,629 bytes)
5. Re: LF: ROS 502kHz X-Band 3602kHz (score: 1): Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:56:06 +0000; G. 3578 .. was a good frequency for MF-1 / 7 Reply , just on the edge of the psk band , giving carrier 3579.5 X 2 ros will not work on most pc 's with the new level of coding; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00521.html (13,086 bytes)
6. Re: LF: ROS 502kHz X-Band 3602kHz (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:11:30 +0100; Ok G The problem will be with the other station , may not be able to run x 2 ros without conflict ..I think 3578 was / is a good call back using MF mode as 100 hz wide and works fine on 80 .. that wa; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00634.html (14,179 bytes)
7. Re: LF: ROS 502kHz X-Band 3602kHz (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:58:43 -0500 (EST); RX1: 19:59 @ 6,7 Hz: CQ CQ DE G4WGT IN IO83QO 502KHZ OR 3590KHZ X-BAND ROS4 PSE K <STOP> -24 dB 655 km @ 329º 0,502 Mhz RX1: 20:06 @ 6,7 Hz: CQ CQ DE G4WGT IN IO83QO 502KHZ OR 3590KHZ X-BAND ROS4 PSE; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg01154.html (9,003 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]