Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+defence\s+of\s+WSPR\s+Signals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+defence\s+of\s+WSPR\s+Signals\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: defence of WSPR Signals (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:26:13 +0100; Jim, Yes your right, the onset of wspr activity on the 500 has paved the way for increased activity and out side interest, from previous data tests ran in the early day of the allocation, considerabl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00196.html (16,797 bytes)
2. LF: RE: defence of WSPR Signals (score: 1): Author: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:47:38 +0100; Adding my thoughts to the debate, 500Khz and WSPR has rekindled my interest in radio and I am learning lots in new areas. As a G7 and not an expert in CW, if CW was the only means of communication on; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00751.html (13,765 bytes)
3. LF: Re: defence of WSPR Signals (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:00:53 +0100; Well having spent a few days looking at WSPR I would tend to fit best in the 'repetitious rubbish' group.... WSPR is specifically designed for weak signal reception, and there is certainly a case of; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00803.html (10,333 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]