Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+TA\s+500KHz\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+TA\s+500KHz\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: TA 500KHz (score: 1): Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:24:51 +0100; Can anyone else ID the signal Victor has received? Gary, Victor has typo in his mail. The signal is from WD2XSH/17. Dave was last night on about 505.255 kHz -- 73 Hartmut www.h-wolff.de Locator: JO5; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00035.html (8,848 bytes)
2. LF: RE: TA 500KHz (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:46:15 +0100; Hi Victor, LF, Have you got the frequency correct? I can't find any allocation there from over the pond (TA). I have carefully checked my grabber saves & I don't see even a hint of a signal there. Co; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00273.html (9,122 bytes)
3. RE: LF: RE: TA 500KHz (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:23:12 +0100; Hi Victor & Hartmut, Thanks for info, I have checked my grabber saves on the correct frequency & have found this partial call sign being the best capture at 0232 to 0235utc on approx 505.260KHz. I ca; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00391.html (10,346 bytes)
4. RE: LF: RE: TA 500KHz (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:33:19 +0100; Hello Hartmut,Gary,all, I just checked my receiver at 162 and 198 KHz,it is spot on (within 0.05Hz) so I really received this signal at 505.260 KHz.Of course I don't know if it is from the states ...; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-11/msg00584.html (8,942 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]