Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+energy\s+saving\s+bulbs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+energy\s+saving\s+bulbs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: energy saving bulbs (score: 1): Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:10:06 +0100; Hello LFers, I've been using the CFL of the double helix variety for a number of years here with good results. I've not noted any increase in the "noise field" of my home, both in the shack and elsew; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-03/msg00002.html (10,710 bytes)
2. LF: RE: Re: energy saving bulbs (score: 1): Author: Chris Trayner <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 20:32:15 +0000; Dear All, Thanks, Alan, for your thoughts. to the bulb is converted into radiation ! some is light and some is heat.....a CLF just produces less heat and more light and more polution! Well, in a sens; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-03/msg00415.html (12,157 bytes)
3. LF: RE: Re: energy saving bulbs (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:35:38 +0100; My two cents: Do NOT use the 16 watts version of the Philips SL E Pro model: these bulbs generate a LOT of noise (50 Hz comb broadband noise) at least on 137 kHz ... 73 de Jean-Louis; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-03/msg00426.html (7,742 bytes)
4. LF: Re: Re: energy saving bulbs (score: 1): Author: "Hugh_m0wye" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:57:47 +0100; Peter and group, I don't know if this contributes to the original discussion, but I found this table which shows the relative efficencies of different types of lamp: The original is here: http://en.w; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-03/msg00456.html (15,674 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]