Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Loops\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Loops\s+again\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Loops again (score: 1): Author: "WE0H" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 10:24:04 -0600; What is special about an Ashlock loop you ask; the tuning components. Nothing new and exotic just explained real well by Bill and tested over and over to refine the procedure and construction and ins; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00093.html (11,955 bytes)
2. LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Loops again (score: 1): Author: "Mike Staines" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 10:53:32 -0500; The article I mentioned does say that electrically tiny loops are inefficient - but aren't electrically tiny verticals inefficient too? Unfortunately, I suspect that this discussion will now degrade; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00094.html (10,294 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]