Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Antenna\s+relays\s+\-\s+multifilar\s+Litz\s+coil\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Re: Antenna relays - multifilar Litz coil (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 22:08:34 +0000
I think it would increase the coil losses, compared to a higher inductance coil of same Q, without the capacitor. Pcoil = I*U/Q At same radiated power, you'll have the same voltage but higher coil c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00467.html (11,865 bytes)

2. Re: LF: RE: Re: Antenna relays - multifilar Litz coil (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 22:33:53 +0000
H indeed, parallel capacitor will increase the coil current, but on the other hand you will get resonance with a smaller inductance. I haven't done any calculation on the case (yet), but probably bo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00469.html (12,705 bytes)

3. Re: LF: RE: Re: Antenna relays - multifilar Litz coil (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:48:58 -0500
... but you could additionally increase wire diameter by sqrt(2) for the same coil length. Assuming skin effect regime, this will decrease R by another factor of sqrt(2). In other words, same coil Q
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00470.html (11,749 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu